it is not as easy as it seems to use the free data etc. if you factor 
in 
1. symbol changes
2. new symbols
3. symbol deletes
4. splits
5. yahoo and google suddenly changing thier format of data especially 
date formats. 

it is a hair rising experience. i have been thro that and it is not 
worth the time you spend fixing things up. i find it more 
economically to spend 25 bucks a month and let qp2 guys figure it 
out. i can make producive use of my tiem analysing the data that qp2 
gives and make some money out of it.

--- In [email protected], "speaker_2_animals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> All,
> 
> I'm embarking on a rather large and ambitious project and I'm 
thinking the QP2 database 
> could be the best (and most convenient) data source for this 
project. Of course I want the 
> usual OHLCV data for equities but I'm also interested in index, 
industry group and general 
> market data like "number of advances", "number of 
declines", "volatility" and so forth. And 
> fundemental data! QP2 provides all of this.
> 
> What QP2 doesn't seem to provide are measures like option chains, 
Put/Call Ratio and 
> Open Interest. Guess you can't have everything.
> 
> Before I commit to QP2, though, I'm wondering if there are free 
alternatives such as Yahoo 
> or Google quotes and if it's possible to extract these quotes in 
either a tabular or XML 
> format. Grabbing the content of a web page programmatically is a no-
brainer, but I don't 
> want to parse all of the HTML cruft that comes with it. And I don't 
want to manually read 
> and download CSV files. In the world of Web 2.0 everything should 
work seemlessly as a 
> web service.
> 
> If I do go with QP2, the next problem I have is how to get this 
data out of the QP2 
> database. It appears I would have to write my code (currently Java 
for portability) on the 
> same Windows platform as where the QP2 database resides. I would 
prefer to develop 
> under Unix or Mac OS X, but unless there's a way to remotely access 
that data, I think I'm 
> stuck with Windows.
> 
> So... any opinions? Are there any free options I've overlooked that 
I could access remotely 
> and that provide as convenitent and comprehensive a data set as QP2?
> 
> -- John
>


Reply via email to