Markus I undestand is that your setup is Wengophone <=> QuteCom.... Can you test please QuteCom <=> QuteCom
Thanks Vadim Markus Hossner wrote: > Hi > > > Am 30.06.2009 12:40 Uhr, schrieb Simon Morlat: > >> The reason for the RTP_TIMESTAMP_NEWER_THAN macro is that timestamps are >> circular. Using won't work in all cases. Indeed 0 is newer than (2^31)+1. >> It seems that the problem is that both timestamp don't grow identically. >> Having a video timestamp growing by +10 is problematic. It would mean that >> video frames are separated by 10/90000=1.1111e-04 s, so a framerate of 9000 >> frame per second. Are you inventing a new VVHD standart (Very Very High >> Definition) -:) ? >> > > > So the problem lies in the packet timestamp. It should grow like the > wanted timestamp to prevent a difference greater than 1 << 31. > > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > QuteCom-dev mailing list > QuteCom-dev@lists.qutecom.org > http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list QuteCom-dev@lists.qutecom.org http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
