On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Bryan Hertz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi - > I am just wondering if it is possible to create an option that routes voice > calls through port 80 to get around firewalls instead of having to deal with > the HTTP tunnel. > > Is there any reason not to build this sort of functionality? Any technical > reason it would not work? > For example it's what Vbuzzer are doing. it's pretty useful I think because usually SIP & RTp ports are closed on public Wifi for example, actually most of the time only 80 and 443 are opened but I think it's really rare that there is a really firewall analysing traffic. But http tunnel solve another common problem : http Proxy used in most companies. Sip/UDP Over 80/443 won't work with a http proxy. > -- > %<------------------------------------------------------->% Michel memeteau Blog 0.2 : http://memeteau.free.fr Fixe : 0974763294 Mobile : 0624808051 VOIP | Visio: sip:[email protected] <sip%[email protected]> jabber/GTalk : xmpp:[email protected] <xmpp%[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
