Hi, As I understand, NAT traversal support improved in QuteCom 3.0 and now QuteCom has STUN support in its SIP signaling and even better, ICE support in its RTP communication. So what do you mean by "Stun support need to be tested". Does it hold SIP, RTP, or both of them? Does it mean STUN support is implemented and needs extra test or it is still in the development stage or have sensitive bugs? What about ICE and TURN?
Hello, Since QuteCom 2.2 things have changed with qutecom 3.0 Take a look at ph_nat_init() http://trac.qutecom.org/browser/verona/phapi/phapi.c phcfg.nattype should be set to "auto" phcfg.use_tunnel should be set to 0 phcfg.stunserver should be set with an online stun sever This way, sip communication will use stun About RTP streams, mediastreamer should use natively ICE (STUN+TURN) http://trac.qutecom.org/browser/mediastreamer2/src/ice.c Stun support need to be tested I'm trying to add upnp igd support to verona with http://miniupnp.free.fr/ Sip is ok but rtp streams are not :/ Laurent Le 5 juil. 2011 à 19:34, Veljko Milisavljević a écrit : Hello Laurent, >I 've understood from threads that QuteCom is not using STUN, but there is a >patch >which can help. Can you send it to me? > >thanks >Veljko >
_______________________________________________ QuteCom-dev mailing list QuteCom-dev@lists.qutecom.org http://lists.qutecom.org/mailman/listinfo/qutecom-dev
