On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Paul Roebuck wrote:
>>
>>>> It is equivalent to 'evalq' except the its default
>>
>> It would be easier to deal with thes reports if in future you
>> could provide a patch against the source file (here eval.Rd).
>
> I normally download a copy of the current binary and the
> matching source distribution for performing searches, so
> would not be tracking r-devel or r-patched updates.
>
> Would the following have been palatable as annotated?
Yes, it would have been easy to incorporate.
> R-2.1.1/src/library/base/man/eval.Rd:
> 59c59
> < equivalent to \code{evalq} except that its default argument creates a
> ---
>> equivalent to \code{evalq} except the its default argument creates a
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
