On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:36 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Probably because it is discussed in the R-admin manual as having > previously appeared in Debian and being traced to an erroneous patch to > the Lapack 3.0 sources.
You wouldn't happen to have more specific details on this, would you? :) I know there is a fair amount of cruft in the Fedora lapack package, and I'd like to clean it out, but I want to make sure I don't remove any legitimate bug-fixes in the process. (See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169399 for some semi-related discussion of lapack and its patching) Thanks, ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel