Sorry, I meant to write 2.1.1 instead of 2.2.1 below.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I think the following indicates a bug in Im(). > >> Im(-1) > [1] 3.141592653589793115998 >> pi > [1] 3.141592653589793115998 >> Im(0i-1) > [1] 0 >> Im(-0.9876) > [1] 3.141592653589793115998 >> Im(-987654321) > [1] 3.141592653589793115998 >> Im(1) > [1] 0 >> is.complex(-1) > [1] FALSE > > This is R 2.2.0; Im(-1) == 0 with R 2.2.1. > > Thanks, > > Dan > >> version > _ > platform i386-pc-linux-gnu > arch i386 > os linux-gnu > system i386, linux-gnu > status > major 2 > minor 2.0 > year 2005 > month 10 > day 06 > svn rev 35749 > language R > > Debian (stable) linux > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
