On 1/24/06, Douglas Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/23/06, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder if it would make more sense to get a relatively > > low level package to run on it so that all packages that > > used that low level package would benefit. The Matrix > > package and the functions runmean and sum.exact in > > package caTools are some things that come to mind. > > Others may have other ideas along these lines. > > Martin and I are delighted to learn that the Matrix package is a > "relatively low-level" package :-) > > We were of the opinion that the amount of code and design work that > went into it made it a little more sophisticated than that.
Low level refers to a package that is typically used by other routines rather than used directly although, of course, it could be. This was not intended to be a comment on the breadth, sophistication or internal complexity of the package. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
