using R 2.3 of 1/31/06
> new("list")
list()
> new("list", list(a=1))
$a
[1] 1
> setClass("listlike", contains="list")
[1] "listlike"
> new("listlike", list(a=1))
An object of class "listlike"
[[1]]
[1] 1
Why does the list in the second construction lose
the element name? A workaround is to endow the
listlike class with a names slot, but it would
be nice for the names to be propagated from the
data to the object.
Loss of names in a numeric construction does
not require extension:
> new("numeric", c(a=1))
[1] 1
But coercion can allow names to persist.
> as(c(a=1), "numeric")
a
1
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
