On 4/11/06, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, A.J. Rossini wrote: > > > I will say this first -- I can't copy/paste the error message from the > > screen, so it's being retyped. Errors might occur. SORRY. > > > > I've been experiencing some interesting stack warnings recently when > > moving from R 2.2.x to the R 2.3.0 series and the R 2.4.0 series. In > > particular, I'm getting warnings of "Error: C stack usage is too close > > to the limit" before segfaulting, and this wasn't happening under the > > 2.2.x series.
Okay, using 2-2-patched, I'm fine. Using 2-3-patched and R-devel, I'm not fine (stack warnings and segfaulting). What is the precise incantation for setting the stack? using "--max-ppsize=N" didn't seem to help my problem (for values of N of 5000, 25000, 50000 -- should I try others?) (This is under SBCL, i.e. satisfying Duncan's conjectures -- as soon as I fix a few things (i.e. undoing CommonLispStat/R's threading which is a bit SBCL specific, I'll try under CLISP, ECL, and CMUCL to verify/check). best, -tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Muttenz, Switzerland. "Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05). ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel