On 5/21/06, Deepayan Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/21/06, Gabor Grothendieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks. I should have realized that. Now that I read it again with > > your explanation it is clear. > > > > At the same time it would be convenient if one could specify a viewport > > or vpPath, as well. If that were the case we could also eliminate the > > names.* methods in this example. (These were included to encapsulate > > access to them so that the main code does not muck around in the > > internals.) > > Probably true, but that's a change that belongs in grid. I don't want > to make unnecessary assumptions about grid functions and then be > caught by an API change (which is one of the reasons I don't want to > be explicit in ?print.trellis about what the 'draw.in' argument must > be). > > Deepayan >
I agree. Maybe Paul will consider adding something to facilitate using a name, viewport or vpPath interchangeably so the user does not have to concern himself with such details. This seems like a good application of OO. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
