On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > Thomas Lumley wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> This is a rather interesting, but I don't think it is a bug - it is >>> just things that "you are not supposed to do" >> >> It was a bug. It has been fixed in R 2.4.0. Unfortunately, since you >> didn't quote the PR# of the original bug in the subject line you have >> just filed a new bug report for it. >> >> -thomas > > I am sorry (about both the duplicate report and the comment). > > I don't know what happened with the duplication - but as you see > I replied to both r-devel and r-bugs in the same e-mail, and the > one arriving back via r-devel did have the right subject with > the PR#9202 at the end, and the other copy via r-bugs didn't and > got a new one. It seems somewhere during in the round-trip > over-long subject lines get truncated and/or a new-line inserted in > the middle. May worth investigating...
We know you need to have the PR# number on the first line of the subject. This is why Thomas duplicated it (and I move it to the beginning). At one time JitterBug had a higher version number than R, and at around that time it seemed to be orphaned. Now R > 2.4.0, and JitterBug is still at 1.6.2. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
