On 10/28/06, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/28/2006 6:03 PM, Philippe Grosjean wrote:
> > Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I've just added this function to R-devel (to become 2.5.0 next spring):
> >>
> >> withVisible <- function(x) {
> >> x <- substitute(x)
> >> v <- .Internal(eval.with.vis(x, parent.frame(), baseenv()))
> >> v
> >> }
> >>
> >> Luke Tierney suggested simplifying the interface (no need to duplicate
> >> the 3 parameter eval interface, you can just wrap this in evalq() if you
> >> need that flexibility); the name "with.vis" was suggested, but it looks
> >> like an S3 method for the with() generic, so I renamed it.
> >>
> >> Duncan Murdoch
> >
> > Excellent, many thanks... but I am afraid I cannot use this function
> > because you force evaluation on parent.frame(), where I need to evaluate
> > it in .GlobalEnv (which is NOT equal to parent.frame() in my context).
> > Would it be possible to change it to:
> >
> > withVisible <- function(x, env = parent.frame()) {
> > x <- substitute(x)
> > v <- .Internal(eval.with.vis(x, env, baseenv()))
> > v
> > }
> >
> > ...so that we got additional flexibility?
>
> As I said, that's not needed. Use evalq(withVisible(x), envir=.GlobalEnv).
Even if its not strictly necessary in terms of minimality it still might be
convenient and consistent with other eval-style functions which do tend
to provide an env= or in the case of lm-style functions a data= argument.
Also its very easy to do and the underlying internal function supports it.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
