On 29 October 2006 at 19:29, Peter Dalgaard wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | | > ... unless of course all those checkins went to trunk/ aka R-devel. | | ... which "svn -r 39733:BASE" on the branch would have told you:
At that point it "couldn't have" as I was quoting from the web-log as I wrote (quoting from my email now) | then happen to have been 2006-10-27? Not according to the top of the svn log | from http://developer.r-project.org/R.svnlog.2006: (and cut down to dates I am now proud owner of (partial) svn checkrout (of 2.4-patched only) so I take the hint with re the svn usage with nodding approval. Thanks, Dirk -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
