Ben Bolker wrote: > Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Peter Dalgaard wrote: >> >> >>> Ben Bolker wrote: >>> >>>> Petr Savicky <savicky <at> cs.cas.cz> writes: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Could you also include a script, which reproduces the problem? Just >>>>> to see under which conditions the problem occurs and how it >>>>> looks like exactly. >>>>> >>>>> Petr Savicky. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The original post has such a script, just under the dashed line >>>> and above the diff/patch. Sorry if I wasn't clear about that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Patch inserted in r-devel now. >>> >> And all optim() methods now work on zero-length 'par'. >> >> > So my patch would now seem to be unnecessary -- keep it for > belt-and-suspenders purposes, > or remove it to minimize code complexity? > > Isn't broken, do not fix. We can always call it an optimization, avoiding unnecessary calls to optim ;-) ....
______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
