:) It is a good idea, but i don't it would work. We'd have hundreds of emails on R-help and R-devel complaining about mysterious warning messages for code that had been working just fine for two years....
Gabor On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:13:36PM +0800, Berwin A Turlach wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:56 +0100 > Gabor Csardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > OMG, not again please! > > > > FAQ 7.31. > > Yeah, there seems to be a cluster of that type of questions at the > moment. > > Perhaps it is time to introduce a global option "HaveReadFAQ7.31" whose > default is "FALSE" but can be changed via the normal mechanism to > "TRUE". > > Any comparison of numeric values/vectors should print a warning message > "You are comparing numbers calculated using finite precision > arithmetic, have you read FAQ 7.31." while the value of this option is > FALSE. > > Perhaps that will help. :) > > Cheers, > > Berwin > > =========================== Full address ============================= > Berwin A Turlach Tel.: +65 6516 4416 (secr) > Dept of Statistics and Applied Probability +65 6516 6650 (self) > Faculty of Science FAX : +65 6872 3919 > National University of Singapore > 6 Science Drive 2, Blk S16, Level 7 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Singapore 117546 http://www.stat.nus.edu.sg/~statba -- Csardi Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIL DGM ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
