Hey Peter, >> I do not see the Roclets as mini-parsers, but as small R programs >> working on the parse tree/list returned by one big parser/lexer. > > So I imagine that coming up with the intermediate parse-tree > representation would be part of the contract.
Yes, sure. > What would you think, by the way, of writing the parser in a > higher-order language; e.g. Scheme? No, we want a solution in R. I know that there are lots of other languages which are more suitable for writing a parser and designing a DSL, but the advantage of a R solution is that everything is installed and available on the system :-) No additional dependences! Manuel. ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
