On 31 March 2009 at 12:58, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 3/31/2009 10:41 AM, Peter Ruckdeschel wrote:
| > Could we have one (or maybe more) standardized optional tag(s)
| > for package DESCRIPTION files to cover svn revision info?
| > This would be very useful for bug reporting...
Indeed. I am doing something similar with local packages at work.
| > I know that any developer is already free to append corresponding lines
| > to DESCRIPTION files to do something of this sort --- e.g. lines like
| >
| > LastChangedDate: {$LastChangedDate: 2009-03-31 $}
| > LastChangedRevision: {$LastChangedRevision: 447 $}
|
| That will give you the last change to the DESCRIPTION file, not the last
| change to the package, so it could be misleading. Last time I looked,
| there wasn't a way in svn to auto update a file that wasn't involved in
| a changeset. (You could put something into your build script to call
| svnversion, but I don't know anything simpler.)
Yes, I have been using configure for that (which can be really any type of
executable script rather than something from autoconf). One can then either
update a placeholder in DESCRIPTION.in to substitute the revision number
and/or create a package-local function reporting svn revision, build time,
etc.
It may make sense to think about a more general scheme. A common problem is
of course once again portability and the set of required tools.
Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
