On 16/05/2009 10:19 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Martin Maechler wrote:

"UweL" == Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
    on Fri, 15 May 2009 20:48:03 +0200 writes:
[.............]

   >> Thank you for clarifying this and once again apologies for stirring you
   >> up with something that had been fixed in the mean-time already.

   UweL> For R-devel, it is in the svn logs. Since it may change again, NEWS is
   UweL> not always edited while things are tested.

well, and if a new feature is introduced, it gets a NEWS entry
(hopefully), but if the new feature contains bugs, these will be
fixed of course with*OUT* another NEWS entry.

Indeed, the NEWS apply to (eventually) released versions of R,
so fixing transient bugs is *never* documented in NEWS.

... leading us back to what Brian already said:
 >>  'Under development' needs to be taken seriously.

This was a Windows-only issue, so the final version was reported in the May 1 entry in src/gnuwin32/CHANGES, not NEWS:

     o   Rcmd INSTALL --build in 2.9.0 did not make _bundles_ in the
         format install.packages() expected.

[When I looked that was missing from the RSS feed for R-devel, so perhaps another message is to look at the NEWS/CHANGES files directly.]

I think it arrived on May 2; in any case, it's there now:

http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/2009/05/02#c2009-05-02

Duncan Murdoch


As far as I can see from the svn logs, the first attempt at a fix was on April 25 and that was changed to the more successful current solution on April 27 (well over two weeks ago, _pace_ claims earlier in the thread).


______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to