Thomas,

rna is not defined in R, can you, please, supply a reproducible example? From your description I think I know roughly what's going on (Quartz attempts to snap rectangles on pixel boundaries to prevent malignant anti-aliasing effects in image plots and this may somehow interact with pch='.' since Quartz has no way of knowing that those rectangles are supposed to be glyphs), but I cannot reproduce it.

Thanks,
Simon


On Jun 3, 2009, at 4:45 , t...@stat.washington.edu wrote:

Full_Name: Thomas Richardson
Version: R 2.9.0 GUI 1.28 Tiger build 32-bit (5395)
OS: 10.4.11
Submission from: (NULL) (216.254.15.72)



I have encountered a problem with points in scatterplots disappearing in a
quartz window when it is re-sized (to make it larger).

I am constructing an 8x12 matrix of scatterplots each containing approx 600
points.
In order to get them in the window I remove the axes etc.,

quartz()
par(mfrow=c(8,12), mar=c(0,0,0,0), oma=c(0,0,0,0))
for(i in 1:8){ # Row counter
for(j in 1:12){ # Col counter           
plot(rna$red[(rna$row==levels(rna$row[i])&(rna$col==j)],
    rna$tof[(rna$row==levels(rna$row[i])&(rna$col==j)],
    xlab="tof",ylab="green",xaxt="n",yaxt="n",
    ann=FALSE,xlim=c(0,100),ylim=c(0,300),pch=".")
}
}

Here is the problem: how many data points actually appear in the quartz window on my screen is highly sensitive to the width and height specified. If I specify
a different width and height for the quartz window e.g.
quartz(width=8,height=8), OR if I resize the window with the cursor then points disappear in certain (x-axis) ranges across all the plots in some columns. These bands in which points disappear are the same for all plots in a given column,
and can be very wide - making a lot of points disappear.

(The visual effect is to make it look as if there are clearly defined vertical white lines going across the scatterplots - though the black lines enclosing
each plot are not broken).

The problem seems to disappear with other plotting symbols e.g. pch="+" (but then I end up with crowded plots). So I guess it might be related to the
"special treatment" of "." described on help(points) ??
---
Value pch="." (equivalently pch = 46) is handled specially. It is a rectangle of
side 0.01 inch (scaled by cex).
---

I find this behaviour unnerving: the (resized) plots made it look as if there was a lot of structure in the data, but on closer inspection it turned out to be
entirely a consequence of the quartz device and plot function!

I can't imagine that this behaviour is intended - even if it were intended to suppress points (like some axis labels) - it seems strange that enlarging the window makes points disappear. (I also tried setting dpi=72 in quartz(), but
this did not fix the problem).

Thanks in advance.

Thomas

------------------------------------------------------
sessionInfo()
R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
i386-apple-darwin8.11.1

locale:
en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel



______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to