Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes: >> 2) As part of the binary package build process, run CHECK >> with R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS = false.
> 1, 3-5 sound fine, but I do not see why you need 2). I suppose because it makes me feel dirty to leave the check step out entirely, if there is some utility available from it. But I've got a reputation as an overengineer, so.. In any case, I agree that the earlier check doesn't add anything except possible satisfaction by the binary-package maintainers. - Allen S. Rout ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
