I've fixed this by adding 0.5/mn to q. The problem (at least in principle)
with multiplying them all up is integer overflow.
By the time 0.5/mn underflows to zero, missing one value in the distribution
won't matter.
-thomas
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, David John Allwright wrote:
Dear Thomas, Right, thank you. Yes, I haven't looked at the source code
(because I don't know C) but something like what you mention could well cause
the kind of problems I am seeing: a loop being exectued one too few or one
too many times. And yes, I think those quantities should be multiplied up by
m*n to all become integers so we escape rounding error problems. David.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, tlum...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, allwr...@maths.ox.ac.uk wrote; (in part)
x<-1:5
y<-c(2.5,4.5)
ks.test(x,y)
The value of the D_2,5 statistic is calculated as 0.4 correctly, but the
p-value is stated by R as 1, though in fact it should be 20/21=0.9524
What we seem to have here is a rounding error problem.
In ks.c:psmirnov2x, there is a double loop including
if(fabs(i / md - j / nd) > q)
u[j] = 0;
where md=2, nd=5, and q=3/10.
Now, to full precision abs(1/2 - 4/5) > 3/10 is false, but at least on my
MacBook it is true in C double precision.
I'm not sure why the loop is working with doubles, since multiplying by m*n
should make everything an integer.
-thomas
Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlum...@u.washington.edu University of Washington, Seattle
Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
tlum...@u.washington.edu University of Washington, Seattle
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
