Hello, I notice in main/arithmetic.c, that NA and NaN are encoded differently(since every numeric NA comes from R_NaReal which is defined via ValueOfNA) . What is the benefit of treating these two differently? Why can't NA be a synonym for NaN?
Thank you Saptarshi (R-2.9) ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
