Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > > I think you will find that 'n' is used in several ways in predict.lm, > and since NA-handling was introduced in R 1.8.0 they may differ in > value. So the safest route seems to be to change just 'n' in > > df <- n - p
Yes, that seems to fix things. Will commit to R-devel shortly. -p -- Peter Dalgaard Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Phone: (+45)38153501 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
