On 25/02/2011 12:16 AM, robin hankin wrote:
Hi.
I am having difficulty making \Sexpr work as desired.
Specifically, the pdf and the text versions of the help system
differ, and I can't reproduce the example on page 63 of
the R Journal article by Murdoch and Urbanek (Vol 1/2,
December 2009).
Is there an example package that I could examine for Best Practice?
We use \Sexpr in only a couple of places currently: in the NEWS.Rd
files (which are treated differently than other .Rd files), and in the
tools package where it is illustrated (see ?tools::Rd2HTML; the last few
lines of the note are generated using \Sexpr).
If you put together a simple .Rd file that shows the difference you're
seeing, I'll take a look.
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel