Considering that the package.skeleton() function really is a "package writer" of sorts, I agree that "package author" is clearer.
Kevin On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Davor Cubranic <cubra...@stat.ubc.ca> wrote: > In a conversation with a programmer new to writing R packages, he mentioned > that he was very confused by phrase "package writer" used in the document, > and said that he "[was] literally imagining some sort of function that > writes something related to packages". > > I can see his point: not only is it confusing, but I think it's also bad > English (one wouldn't say "the novel's writer"). Can this be changed to > "package author"? > > Davor > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
