On 06/02/2011 06:47 AM, Benilton Carvalho wrote: > 'R CMD check' should be applied on the .tar.gz, not on the source directory.
Why? The help says: "Check R packages from package sources, which can be directories or package 'tar' archives with extension '.tar.gz', '.tar.bz2' or '.tgz'." I just skimmed through the relevant section (1.3.1) in the R Extensions manual, and it doesn't say anything about running on tarballs being preferred. Add my vote to the wishlist that the src directory should get cleaned after R CMD check. Ben Bolker > > So, it'd be something like: > > R CMD build pkg > R CMD check pkg_version.tar.gz > > b > > On 2 June 2011 06:54, Marius Hofert <m_hof...@web.de> wrote: >> Dear expeRts, >> >> I work on the R package "nacopula" >> (https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/nacopula/) under Mac OS X 10.6.7 >> (MacBook Pro). The session info is: >> R version 2.14.0 Under development (unstable) (2011-05-02 r55730) >> Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit) >> >> When I apply "R CMD check nacopula" my source directory is filled with .o >> files (which leads to >> a warning for the next check). Further, if I use R 2.14.0, the check >> produces a file "nacopula-Ex.R" >> on the top level, i.e., where folders like R, src, tests, man, inst, and >> demo reside. >> Shouldn't the source directory stay nice-and-clean, without being filled >> with .o >> files and example files? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Marius >> >> Attachment: screen shot >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> R-SIG-Mac mailing list >> r-sig-...@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mac >> >> > > > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
