On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:15 PM, peter dalgaard <pda...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd say that the burden of proof is really on your side, but how hard can it > be: > >> x <- 1:10 >> y <- rnorm(10) >> m <- lm(y~x) >> m$call > lm(formula = y ~ x) >> m$call$data > NULL > I see... indeed, thx for the answer and sorry for my stupidity. Should have thought about that case. Still, I wonder why it is necessary to go look for the data in a calling environment if it should be contained in the model frame of the fitted object. Or am I again wrong in assuming that's always the case?
Cheers Joris -- Joris Meys Statistical consultant Ghent University Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Department of Applied mathematics, biometrics and process control tel : +32 9 264 59 87 joris.m...@ugent.be ------------------------------- Disclaimer : http://helpdesk.ugent.be/e-maildisclaimer.php ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel