hello folks [snip]
> but it is frustrating when base > functionality only works with vectors, not matrices, or arrays. It > would be more compelling if (e.g.) t and rev also had dimension > arguments. > > Hadley > > -- well put! I would add, though, that t() generalizes to aperm(), and the magic package contains arev() which is a generalization of rev(). I'm always on the lookout for other array functionality of this type that might sit well with magic. Anyone? best wishes Robin > Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair > Department of Statistics / Rice University > http://had.co.nz/ > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Robin Hankin Uncertainty Analyst hankin.ro...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
