Very quick & short answer: I made the transition to ./vignettes for hyperSpec (you can look at the source at r-forge) - it was a mess. It is almost working now (compression is missing, I'll have to figure out how to invoke ghostscript in an OS idependent way, qpdf doesn't give me the compression rates).
I have .pdf is under version control only for those vignettes that I build externally (with the fake .Rnws that produce the proper indexing as vignette). They are all (regardless whether BUILD and check affect them or not) in ./vignettes. I think that strategy can at least partially solve the issue with non-Sweave vignettes as well as long as the result is a pdf. You may need to play with ./vignettes/.install_extras if additional, non pdf and non Rnw files are needed. Best, Claudia ________________________________________ Von: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] im Auftrag von Yihui Xie [x...@yihui.name] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 23:28 An: Terry Therneau Cc: r-devel@r-project.org Betreff: Re: [Rd] Vignette questions For 1, you should run R CMD check on the tar ball (pkg_x.x.tar.gz) from R CMD build instead of the source directory. R CMD build will build the PDF vignette into the tar ball. For 2, I have been confused by ./vignettes vs ./inst/doc since ./vignettes was introduced. I might be able to figure it out by try-and-err but I never tried, and I'm still sticking to ./inst/doc. At least you can exclude the Rnw source in .Rbuildignore so that R can only stare at your PDF documents and sigh. For 3, I remember some of us requested that R could also respect entries of non-Sweave vignettes (like the ones in ./demo/00Index), but this is not possible as far as I know. However, I can tell you a dark voodoo seems to be still working: you can write your own index.html under ./inst/doc with your own links to vignettes. Regards, Yihui -- Yihui Xie <xieyi...@gmail.com> Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name Department of Statistics, Iowa State University 2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Terry Therneau <thern...@mayo.edu> wrote: > Context: R2.15-0 on Ubuntu. > > 1. I get a WARNING from CMD check for "Package vignette(s) without > corresponding PDF: > In this case the vignettes directory had both the pdf and Rnw; do I need to > move the pdf to inst/doc? > > I'm reluctant to add the pdf to the svn source on Rforge, per the usual > rule that a code management system should not have both a primary source and > a object dervived from it under version control. However, if this is the > suggested norm I could do so. > > 2. Close reading of the paragraph about vignette sources shows the following > -- I think? If I have a vignette that should not be rebuilt by "check" or > "BUILD" I should put the .Rnw source and pdf in /inst/doc, and have the > others that should be rebuilt in /vignettes. This would include any that > use "private R packages, screen snapshots, ...", or in my case one that > takes just a little short of forever to run. > > 3. Do these unprocessed package also contribute to the index via > \VignetteIndexEntry lines, or will I need to create a custom index? > > Terry Therneau > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
