Never mind. Found the problem: The package has been missing a subset method for the "lp" class since [...]. Adding "[.lp" solved the problem.
Cheers, Andy -----Original Message----- From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Liaw, Andy Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:34 AM To: r-devel@r-project.org Subject: [Rd] Strange behavior of model.frame() when given subset Dear R-devel, I recent got a bug report from a locfit user about the use of the subset argument when calling locfit(). Basically the symptom is that the following two calls should produce the same result, but they don't: locfit(y ~ lp(x, h=1), data=subset(dat, x > 1)) locfit(y ~ lp(x, h=1), data=dat, subset= x > 1) I've tracked the problem down to something shown in the following example, but have no idea how to get further: R> x <- 1:5 R> y <- sample(5) R> m1 <- model.frame(y ~ lp(x)) R> m2 <- model.frame(y ~ lp(x), subset=x>1) R> class(m1[[2]]) [1] "lp" R> class(m2[[2]]) [1] "matrix" So basically model.frame() seems to treat the lp() term differently depending on whether the subset argument is present or not. Is this supposed to happen? str(m1) and str(m2) show that besides having one row less and the lp() term being of class matrix instead of "lp", there's no difference between m1 and m2. I'd really appreciate it if anyone shed some light on this. Best, Andy Merck Research Labs Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachme...{{dropped:11}} ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachme...{{dropped:11}} ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
