On Jun 10, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> 
> On 8 June 2012 at 12:27, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
> | PS: Dirk do you want me to post this on the Rcpp list for record?
> 
> Yes, that generally is where Rcpp questions / comments / hints should go. 
> 
> As for multi-arch builds, I am not sure we even thought about supporting this 
> so if
> it breaks your use of Rcpp and related packages, you get to keep the pieces.
> That said, I'd be interested in supporting it eventually but I guess I want
> to first understand better how/if it is supported (on Linux) by R itself.
> 

R itself of course supports it and essentially all packages (including Rcpp ;)) 
have to because we require it on Windows and OS X since all binaries there are 
multi-lib. As far as R is concerned it works equally well on Linux - the 
problem there is more on the side of distributions, because it is more unusual 
to have multi-lib Linux (originally it was used on Linux only to get 3rd party 
[mostly proprietary] 32-bit binaries working on 64-bit systems and that is now 
less of an issue). As I said in the original post it works reasonably well on 
Debian (not for all libraries since only a subset is available, but all the 
basic ones) -- there were shakeups in Ubuntu which were messing with the 
multilib support, so I don't know the current status but I can check at work 
tomorrow (probably not for something as ancient as natty, though).

Cheers,
Simon


> 
> -- 
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> 
> 

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to