On Jun 10, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 8 June 2012 at 12:27, Renaud Gaujoux wrote: > | PS: Dirk do you want me to post this on the Rcpp list for record? > > Yes, that generally is where Rcpp questions / comments / hints should go. > > As for multi-arch builds, I am not sure we even thought about supporting this > so if > it breaks your use of Rcpp and related packages, you get to keep the pieces. > That said, I'd be interested in supporting it eventually but I guess I want > to first understand better how/if it is supported (on Linux) by R itself. >
R itself of course supports it and essentially all packages (including Rcpp ;)) have to because we require it on Windows and OS X since all binaries there are multi-lib. As far as R is concerned it works equally well on Linux - the problem there is more on the side of distributions, because it is more unusual to have multi-lib Linux (originally it was used on Linux only to get 3rd party [mostly proprietary] 32-bit binaries working on 64-bit systems and that is now less of an issue). As I said in the original post it works reasonably well on Debian (not for all libraries since only a subset is available, but all the basic ones) -- there were shakeups in Ubuntu which were messing with the multilib support, so I don't know the current status but I can check at work tomorrow (probably not for something as ancient as natty, though). Cheers, Simon > > -- > Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel