> It was pointed out to me by a member of CRAN that detecting --as-cran is > insufficient. CRAN only runs incoming tests with settings equivalent to > that. The daily tests use different options. I don't know what those are, > and CRAN is unwilling to discuss their internal policies on this list. (I > would guess they find the tantrums and false claims here to be frustrating. > I do.)
It's equally frustrating to not know how CRAN works. I feel like we share common goals (making quality software) but somehow there is a communication gap that has lead to an overly combative stance between package authors and CRAN. I appreciate that the CRAN maintainers are busy, but I would hope that communicating exactly what's going on publicly would save time by avoiding individual conversations with package authors. Hadley -- Assistant Professor Department of Statistics / Rice University http://had.co.nz/ ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
