On 11/10/2015 10:36 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 8:05 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>> It seems odd/inconvenient to me that the "ignore.environment" argument
>> of identical() only applies to closures (which I read as 'functions' --
>> someone can enlighten me about the technical differences between
>> functions and closures if they like -- see below for consequences of my
>> confusion). This is certainly not a bug, it's clearly documented, but
>> it seems like a design flaw. It would certainly be convenient to be
>> able to ignore differences in environments when comparing complex
>> objects with lots of deeply nested formula and terms objects with
>> environments ...
>>
>> Can anyone suggest a reason for this design?
>>
>> Example:
>>
>>> f1 <- formula()
>>> f2 <- formula()
>>> environment(f2) <- new.env()
>>> identical(f1,f2)
>> [1] FALSE
>>> identical(f1,f2,ignore.environment=TRUE)
>> [1] FALSE
>>
>> Actually, maybe I don't understand how this is supposed to work since I
>> thought this would be TRUE:
>>
>>> f1 <- function() {}
>>> f2 <- function() {}
>>> environment(f1) <- new.env()
>>> environment(f2) <- new.env()
>>> identical(f1,f2,ignore.environment=TRUE) ## FALSE
>
> Those two functions likely have different srcref attributes. If you
> created f2 using f2 <- f1, you'd get your expected result.
>
>>
>> Maybe the problem *is* that I don't know the difference between a
>> function and a closure ... ?
>
> In R, there is no difference. All functions are closures.
>
> Some people only use "closure" for functions returned as the value of
> other functions. That may be correct usage in other languages, but not
> in R.
Sorry, I meant all user functions are closures. There are other kinds
of function in R called "primitives" (e.g. c(), many low level math
functions, the functions that implement flow control, etc.).
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
