On 2015-12-17 19:30, peter dalgaard wrote:
Presumably the file in question is one of
Peter-Dalgaards-MacBook-Air:BUILD pd$ grep -r "^Package: tools" *
library/tools/DESCRIPTION:Package: tools
src/library/tools/DESCRIPTION:Package: tools
so the first thing I'd do is to have a good look at those files and see if they
got somehow corrupted.
If they look sane, presumably the bit of code that checks it isn't... So that
would be my next thing to check.
-pd
I had just gotten here, and tried comparing them with the 32-bit build
(as I do not know what sane is yet).
Sources are in:
/data/prj/cran/R-3.2.3
Builds are in:
/data/prj/cran/32/R-3.2.3 and
/data/prj/cran/64/R-3.2.3
The files, in the build directories look "sane", at least comparable
root@x065:[/data/prj/cran/R-3.2.3]sdiff -w 132
/data/prj/cran/??/R-3.2.3/library/tools/DESCRIPTION
Package: tools
Package: tools
Version: 3.2.3
Version: 3.2.3
Priority: base
Priority: base
Title: Tools for Package Development
Title: Tools for Package Development
Author: R Core Team
Author: R Core Team
Maintainer: R Core Team <r-c...@r-project.org>
Maintainer: R Core Team <r-c...@r-project.org>
Description: Tools for package development, administration and
Description: Tools for package development, administration and
License: Part of R 3.2.3
License: Part of R 3.2.3
Suggests: XML, codetools, methods
Suggests: XML, codetools, methods
Built: R 3.2.3; powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.7.0; 2015-12-17 12:02:34 UTC |
Built: R 3.2.3; ; Thu Dec 17 17:39:55 UTC 2015; unix
As the 32-bit build completes, while the 64-bit stops at "tools" there
is a difference in what they have available:
root@x065:[/data/prj/cran/R-3.2.3]ls -l
/data/prj/cran/??/R-3.2.3/library/tools
/data/prj/cran/32/R-3.2.3/library/tools:
total 72
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 33 356 Dec 17 12:02 DESCRIPTION
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 33 3665 Dec 16 11:37 INDEX
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 17 08:45 Meta
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 33 7112 Dec 17 12:02 NAMESPACE
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 17 12:02 R
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 16 11:37 help
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 16 11:37 html
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 16 11:34 libs
/data/prj/cran/64/R-3.2.3/library/tools:
total 40
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 33 339 Dec 17 17:40 DESCRIPTION
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 33 7112 Dec 17 17:40 NAMESPACE
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 17 17:19 R
drwxr-sr-x 2 root 33 4096 Dec 17 05:58 libs
So, is dcf.c, or main.c the better place to check. dcf.c does not look
like "fun" - all those lexical arguments at the start:
SEXP attribute_hidden do_readDCF(SEXP call, SEXP op, SEXP args, SEXP env)
{
.... man many lines ....
} else {
/* Must be a regular line with
no tag ... */
line[20] = '\0';
error(_("Line starting '%s ...'
is malformed!"), line);
}
}
}
}
... more lines to go...
Thanks for the assistance!
Michael
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
