Here is tests/reg-tests-1c.Rout.fail - http://pastebin.com/raw/3QVDUBwT
About the libm, I don't know which one R uses. musl has its on libm. http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/math I think I also have openlibm installed, but I don't think that's used. Any more information I can give to help debug this? Thanks. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapom...@gmail.com> >>>>>> on Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:33:11 -0200 writes: > > > Here's what I did. > > svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/ > > cd ./trunk > > aclocal -I m4 && autoconf > > tools/rsync-recommended > > cd .. > > mkdir build > > cd build > > ../trunk/configure > > make > > make check > > > On make check it gives an error. > > Here's the log. > > http://pastebin.com/raw/1qfjqQY2 > > Thank you. It shows some output differences for complex > arithmetic, which *may* be a bad sign for the musl routines, or > the (also alternative ??) math lib you have on your platform. > But these differences where not leading to the failure, > rather is the reason close to the end of the log: > ------------------------------------------------ > make[3]: *** [reg-tests-1c.Rout] Error 1 > ------------------------------------------------ > > and these are the very latest regression checks, so they should not fail. > If you want, you can also make the > tests/reg-tests-1c.Rout.fail > > file available via a link above, > but to me, it currently looks there needs to be a bit more work > on your system libraries (or possibly on our configuration) side > before you should bundle R with your Alpine Linux. > > I'd call it "unsafe" for now. > Martin > > -- > Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich and R Core Team. > > >>>> On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Martin Maechler > <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Alba Pompeo <albapom...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>> on Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:23:26 -0200 writes: > > [.........] > > >>>>>>> However, there are a couple little issues with non-ASCII > >>>>>>> text and a *lot* of math differences, many of which say > >>>>>>> "*no* convergence: NOTIFY R-core!". > >>>>> > >>>>> Hmm, I may be off, but these would look like entirely unrelated > >>>>> with the libc_stack_end availibility, wouldn't they ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe you / the musl developers should try to make those C > >>>>> libraries more "standard", notably because I would see math > >>>>> differences as something pretty grave for R, and indeed, I would > >>>>> not want to use a platform where R's math functions work > >>>>> incompatibly with all other platforms ... but maybe I > >>>>> misunderstand completely. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hmm... I've found this, > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Functional_differences_from_glibc#Floating-point_and_mathematical_library > >>>>> > >>>>> which make what you say above more relevant/interesting. > >>>>> > >>>>> Still, from this thread I get that the C source code of R needs > >>>>> considerable configuration patches before R can work with musl. > >>>>> But that needs another thread, something like 'Building R with > musl'. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Until these are resolved, R can't be packaged for > >>>>>>> distributions that use musl, such as Alpine Linux. > >>>>> > >>>>> which I agree would not be ideal. > >>>>> Martin > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Martin <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> > http://stat.ethz.ch/people/maechler > >>>>> Seminar für Statistik, ETH Zürich ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
