In that case, perhaps the question could be changed to could CC0 be added to the list of R licences. Right now the only CC licence that is in the R licenses is CC-BY-SA-4.0.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Brian G. Peterson <br...@braverock.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote: >> It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible >> license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is >> indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be >> the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for >> the public domain. > > I'd second the recommendation for CC0. Lawyers at IP-restrictive firms > I've worked for in the past have been OK with this license. > > - Brian > -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics Resident Fellow, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota char...@stat.umn.edu ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
