>From an example in 
>http://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV.BennoSueselbeck/s-html/helpfiles/nargs.html , 
>number of arguments in '...' can be obtained by
(function(...)nargs())(...) .

I now realize that sys.call() doesn't expand '...' when the function is called 
with '...'. It just returns the call as is. If 'stopifnot' uses sys.call() 
instead of match.call() , the following example behaves improperly:
g <- function(...) stopifnot(...)
g(TRUE, FALSE)

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 18/5/17, Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Rd] stopifnot() does not stop at first non-TRUE argument

 Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
 Date: Thursday, 18 May, 2017, 3:03 PM
 
>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org>
>>>>>     on Tue, 16 May 2017 16:37:45 +0000 writes:

    > switch(i, ...)
    > extracts 'i'-th argument in '...'. It is like
    > eval(as.name(paste0("..", i))) .

Yes, that's neat.

It is only almost the same:  in the case of illegal 'i'
the switch() version returns
    invisible(NULL)

whereas the version we'd want should signal an error, typically
the same error message as

  > t2 <- function(...) ..2
  > t2(1)
  Error in t2(1) (from #1) : the ... list does not contain 2 elements
  > 


    > Just mentioning other things:
    > - For 'n',
    > n <- nargs()
    > can be used.

I know .. [in this case, where '...' is the only formal argument of the 
function]

    > - sys.call() can be used in place of match.call() .

Hmm... in many cases, yes.... notably, as we do *not* want the
argument names here, I think you are right.

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to