Hi Martin,
On 06/07/2017 03:54 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Martin Maechler <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch>
on Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:45:44 +0200 writes:
Hervé Pagès <hpa...@fredhutch.org>
on Fri, 2 Jun 2017 04:05:15 -0700 writes:
>> Hi, I have a long numeric vector 'xx' and I want to use
>> sum() to count the number of elements that satisfy some
>> criteria like non-zero values or values lower than a
>> certain threshold etc...
>> The problem is: sum() returns an NA (with a warning) if
>> the count is greater than 2^31. For example:
>>> xx <- runif(3e9) sum(xx < 0.9)
>> [1] NA Warning message: In sum(xx < 0.9) : integer
>> overflow - use sum(as.numeric(.))
>> This already takes a long time and doing
>> sum(as.numeric(.)) would take even longer and require
>> allocation of 24Gb of memory just to store an
>> intermediate numeric vector made of 0s and 1s. Plus,
>> having to do sum(as.numeric(.)) every time I need to
>> count things is not convenient and is easy to forget.
>> It seems that sum() on a logical vector could be modified
>> to return the count as a double when it cannot be
>> represented as an integer. Note that length() already
>> does this so that wouldn't create a precedent. Also and
>> FWIW prod() avoids the problem by always returning a
>> double, whatever the type of the input is (except on a
>> complex vector).
>> I can provide a patch if this change sounds reasonable.
> This sounds very reasonable, thank you Hervé, for the
> report, and even more for a (small) patch.
I was made aware of the fact, that R treats logical and
integer very often identically in the C code, and in general we
even mention that logicals are treated as 0/1/NA integers in
arithmetic.
For the present case that would mean that we should also
safe-guard against *integer* overflow in sum(.) and that is
not something we have done / wanted to do in the past... Speed
being one reason.
So this ends up being more delicate than I had thought at first,
because changing sum(<logical>) only would mean that
sum(LOGI) and
sum(as.integer(LOGI))
would start differ for a logical vector LOGI.
So, for now this is something that must be approached carefully,
and the R Core team may want discuss "in private" first.
I'm sorry for having raised possibly unrealistic expectations.
No worries. Thanks for taking my proposal into consideration.
Note that the isum() function in src/main/summary.c is already using
a 64-bit accumulator to accommodate intermediate sums > INT_MAX.
So it should be easy to modify the function to make it overflow for
much bigger final sums without altering performance. Seems like
R_XLEN_T_MAX would be the natural threshold.
Cheers,
H.
Martin
> Martin
>> Cheers, H.
>> --
>> Hervé Pagès
>> Program in Computational Biology Division of Public
>> Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
>> 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA
>> 98109-1024
>> E-mail: hpa...@fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax:
>> (206) 667-1319
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_r-2Ddevel&d=DwIDAw&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=dyRNzyVdDYXzNX0sXIl5sdDqDXSxROm4-uM_XMquX_E&s=Qq6QdMWvudWgR_WGKdbBVNnVs5JO6s692MxjDo2JR9Y&e=
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_r-2Ddevel&d=DwIDAw&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=dyRNzyVdDYXzNX0sXIl5sdDqDXSxROm4-uM_XMquX_E&s=Qq6QdMWvudWgR_WGKdbBVNnVs5JO6s692MxjDo2JR9Y&e=
--
Hervé Pagès
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpa...@fredhutch.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
