On Jul 13, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13/07/2017 4:08 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi All,
As per the discussion today on R-Help:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-July/448132.html
I am attaching a proposed patch for poly.Rd to provide clarifying wording
relative to naming the 'degree' argument explicitly, in the case where the 'x'
argument is a matrix, rather than a vector.
This is based upon the svn trunk version of poly.Rd.
I don't think this is the right fix. The use of the unnamed 2nd arg as degree
happens whether the first arg is a matrix or not.
I didn't read the whole thread in detail, but it appears there's a bug
somewhere, in the report or in the poly() code or in the plsr() code. That bug
should be reported on the bug list if it turns out to be in base R, and to the
package maintainer if it is in plsr().
Duncan Murdoch
Duncan,
Thanks for your reply. You only really need to read that last post in the
thread linked to above.
I won't deny the possibility of a bug in poly(), relative to the handling of
'x' as a matrix. The behavior occurs in the poly() function in a pure stand
alone fashion, without the need for plsr():
x1 <- runif(20)
x2 <- runif(20)
mx <- cbind(x1, x2)
poly(mx, 2)
Error in poly(dots[[i]], degree, raw = raw, simple = raw) :
'degree' must be less than number of unique points
The above error occurs because of the way in which 'mx' is transformed
internally in poly(), as per the R-Help post I linked to above.
Compare that to:
poly(mx, degree = 2)
1.0 2.0 0.1 1.1 0.2
[1,] -0.11175349 -0.112802655 0.34729146 -0.038811031 0.29371194
[2,] 0.27620511 -0.102592711 0.27672559 0.076433023 0.10192546
[3,] 0.31709686 -0.000822981 -0.06017089 -0.019080000 -0.20283645
[4,] -0.05873472 -0.213373684 0.26314361 -0.015455666 0.07009778
[5,] -0.17389885 0.046175314 0.08393899 -0.014596893 -0.19610518
[6,] -0.07143282 -0.192226574 0.12931566 -0.009237383 -0.15572309
[7,] -0.20924410 0.156380030 -0.38783860 0.081152937 0.46977236
[8,] 0.09192574 -0.322960534 -0.13012298 -0.011961651 -0.13946871
[9,] -0.08030862 -0.176345544 -0.11855987 0.009521379 -0.15294790
[10,] 0.26551532 -0.126030940 -0.09225246 -0.024494442 -0.17918115
[11,] -0.16961102 0.033781845 0.23980484 -0.040673544 0.01924080
[12,] -0.23503411 0.245845222 0.37898576 -0.089074579 0.39427472
[13,] 0.44343189 0.434902694 0.19305658 0.085607445 -0.06804699
[14,] -0.16429372 0.018706099 -0.04315970 0.007090868 -0.21166328
[15,] 0.04616179 -0.317237087 -0.09818924 -0.004532591 -0.17379927
[16,] -0.20148531 0.130959507 -0.32805340 0.066097939 0.27578123
[17,] -0.25585213 0.323634018 -0.34406268 0.088029169 0.32460950
[18,] -0.21168308 0.164513794 -0.10037452 0.021247587 -0.17173927
[19,] 0.41817752 0.333143463 -0.04018127 -0.016802902 -0.21294380
[20,] 0.08481772 -0.323649275 -0.16929688 -0.014359375 -0.08495871
attr(,"degree")
[1] 1 2 1 2 2
attr(,"coefs")
attr(,"coefs")[[1]]
attr(,"coefs")[[1]]$alpha
[1] 0.3596862 0.5799695
attr(,"coefs")[[1]]$norm2
[1] 1.000000 20.000000 1.898620 0.109334
attr(,"coefs")[[2]]
attr(,"coefs")[[2]]$alpha
[1] 0.5123548 0.5290189
attr(,"coefs")[[2]]$norm2
[1] 1.0000000 20.0000000 1.5765605 0.1255148
attr(,"class")
[1] "poly" "matrix"
Thoughts?
