>>>>> Suharto Anggono <suharto_angg...@yahoo.com>
>>>>> on Sat, 19 Aug 2017 14:35:07 +0000 writes:
> Yes, they work now. I mentioned them partly because the
> commit description said overflow for large n and partly to
> be considered for regression tests.
Thank you, Suharto.
I subsequently have amended NEWS and added such regression tests
(in svn r73108 | 2017-08-19).
Martin
> --------------------------------------------
> On Sat, 19/8/17, Martin Maechler
> <maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Issues of R_pretty in src/appl/pretty.c
> To: "Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono" <suharto_angg...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Date: Saturday, 19 August, 2017, 7:47 PM
>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel@r-project.org>
>>>>> on Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:44:06 +0000 writes:
>> Examples similar to
>> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e300, n = 1e9, min.n = 1)
>> with smaller 'n':
>> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e304, n = 1e5, min.n = 1)
>> pretty(c(-1,1)*1e306, n = 1e3, min.n = 1)
> Thank you.
> "But" all these work now (in R-devel, rev >= 73094) as they should,
> at least for me, right?
> Are you mentioning the "small n" examples so we could use them
> as regression tests (instead of the regression test I had added
> to tests/reg-large.R which needs enough GB and is slowish ) --
> or are you seeing a platform where the above cases still don't
> work in (new enough) R-devel ?
[...............]
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
