Hi,
I have sent this message to this list the July, 7th. It was about a
problem in MASS package.
Until now there is no change in the devel version.
As the problem occurs in a package and not in the R-core, I don't know
if the message should have been sent here. Anyway, I have added a copy
to Pr Ripley.
I hope it could have been fixed.
Sincerely
Marc
Le 09/07/2017 à 16:05, Marc Girondot via R-devel a écrit :
Here is a change required from MASS:::dropterm.glm() and
MASS:::addterm.glm().
Thanks
Marc
The stepAIC() function from package MASS uses extractAIC() to get the
AIC from a model.
Several methods exist:
extractAIC.glm() for example, some in MASS packages and some in stats
package.
The parameters for extractAIC() are:
fit, scale, k = 2, ...
The ... are not used in most of the extractAIC.xxx() methods, from
example in stats:::extractAIC.glm() or MASS:::extractAIC.loglm() but
its presence could be necessary if extractAIC() is changed to use for
example to use AICc rather than AIC.
Within stepAIC(), extractAIC() uses always the ... parameter. So all
is ok for that.
However, stepAIC() uses dropterm() or addterm().
Within MASS:::dropterm.glm() and MASS:::addterm.glm(), extractAIC() is
also used but without the ... parameter.
It prevents to use new version of extractAIC() that could use this
parameter.
The solution is simple:
In MASS:::dropterm.glm(), line 60 and MASS:::addterm.glm(), line 84:
aic <- aic + (extractAIC(object, k = k)[2L] - aic[1L])
must be changed to
aic <- aic + (extractAIC(object, k = k, ...)[2L] - aic[1L])
Other dropterm.xxx() and addterm.xxx() do not suffer this problem.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
