PS I'm tempted to insert a warning at this point and see how often it
actually gets triggered ...
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> Chuck: I don't see how this example represents
> incomplete/incommensurate recycling. Doesn't TRUE replicate from
> length-1 to length-3 in this case (mat[c(TRUE,FALSE),2] would be an
> example of incomplete recycling)?
>
> William: clever, but maybe too clever unless you really need the
> speed? (The clever way is 8 times faster in the following case ...)
>
> x <- rep(1,1e6)
> rbenchmark::benchmark(x[c(FALSE,TRUE,FALSE)],x[seq_along(x) %% 3 == 2])
>
> On the other hand, it takes 0.025 vs 0.003 seconds per iteration ...
> fortunes::fortune("7ms")
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Berry, Charles <ccbe...@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 11:56 AM, Ben Bolker <bbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry if this has been covered here somewhere in the past, but ...
>>>
>>> Does anyone know why logical vectors are *silently* recycled, even
>>> when they are incommensurate lengths, when doing logical indexing?
>>
>> It is convenient to use a single `TRUE' in programmatic manipulation of
>> subscripts in the same manner as using an empty subscript interactively:
>>
>>> mat<-diag(1:3)
>>> expr1 <- quote(mat[])
>>> expr1[[3]] <- TRUE
>>> expr1[[4]] <- 2
>>> eval(expr1)
>> [1] 0 2 0
>>> mat[,2]
>> [1] 0 2 0
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Chuck
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
