Agree. Or just create the data frame with those variables in it directly ...
On 2018-12-13 3:26 p.m., Thomas Yee wrote: > Hello, > > something that has been on my mind for a decade or two has > been the examples for lm() and glm(). They encourage poor style > because of mismanagement of data frames. Also, having the > variables in a data frame means that predict() > is more likely to work properly. > > For lm(), the variables should be put into a data frame. > As 2 vectors are assigned first in the general workspace they > should be deleted afterwards. > > For the glm(), the data frame d.AD is constructed but not used. Also, > its 3 components were assigned first in the general workspace, so they > float around dangerously afterwards like in the lm() example. > > Rather than attached improved .Rd files here, they are put at > www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~yee/Rdfiles > You are welcome to use them! > > Best, > > Thomas > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
