On 2020-07-21 09:00, Martin Maechler wrote:
"AS" == Abby Spurdle
     on Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:28:12 +1200 writes:
     >> "No documentation for ‘sparse.model.matrix’ in
     >> specified packages and libraries", but it's there after
     >> "library(Ecfun)".  I find that interesting, because "Matrix" does not
     >> appear in the Ecfun DESCRIPTION file.

     AS> Not interesting.
     AS> Note the imports and depends fields.
     AS> (Of your own packages).

     >> AND I don't see 'repr = ("C",
     >> "R", "T")' in the "sparse.model.matrix" help file I do see.

     AS> Martin's comment used future tense.

Indeed. It's not even yet in the *development* version of Matrix
on R-forge, see
         packageDescription("Matrix")[["URL"]]
but it probably will be "real soon now".

The problem with that R-forge version (1.3-0) of Matrix is that
half a dozen CRAN packages at least need to be slightly fixed
before that Matrix version becomes default on CRAN,  as these
packages make assumptions about unspecified behavior of some
Matrix functions, notably  Matrix::Matrix()  which in that next version
of Matrix  will produce  "diagonalMatrix" instead of
"CsparseMatrix" objects in more cases....  a good thing, but not
what those packages have assumed...

@Spencer:  Are you actively using  'giveCsparse = ..' somewhere
           in your code?
  If not, why would you be interested in the details of the changes
  (which would be entirely invisible to you as user) ?


      Jim Ramsay is rewriting the code for fda::fRegress.  It requires a double iteration, which is already fairly expensive and often involves large matrices, especially if you want to estimate, e.g., more spline coefficients than observations by using some smoothness criterion to make the problem estimable.  I suggested he consider a singular value decomposition, which would preserve numerical precision AND maybe transform the problem into a series of univariate optimization problems.


      By the way, Ecfun includes some 32 "suggests" and "imports". "Matrix" is not one of them, but it must be called by something else that's loaded by Ecfun, to get the result I got.


      Thanks,
      Spencer

Martin

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to