I am testing out the next release of survival, which involves running R CMD check on 868 CRAN packages that import, depend or suggest it.
The survival package has a lot of data sets, most of which are non-trivial real examples (something I'm proud of). To save space I've bundled many of them, .e.g., data/cancer.rda has 19 different dataframes. This caused failures in 4 packages, each because they have a line such as "data(lung)" or data(breast, package= "survival"); and the data() command looks for a file name. This is a question about which option is considered the best (perhaps more of a poll), between two choices 1. unbundle them again (it does save 1/3 of the space, and I do get complaints from R CMD build about size) 2. send notes to the 4 maintainers. The help files for the data sets have the usage documented as "lung" or "breast", and not data(lung), so I am technically legal to claim they have a mistake. A third option to make the data sets a separate package is not on the table. I use them heavily in my help files and test suite, and since survival is a recommended package I can't add library(x) statements for !(x %in% recommended). I am guessing that this would also break many dependent packages. Terry T. -- Terry M Therneau, PhD Department of Health Science Research Mayo Clinic thern...@mayo.edu "TERR-ree THUR-noh" [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel