Unfortunately your test generates a false positive for httr2 ( https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_httr2.html) and other tidyverse packages where we use the base pipe in examples, but carefully disable them for older versions of R.
Hadley On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:18 AM Ivan Krylov via R-devel < r-devel@r-project.org> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:16:48 +0100 > Kurt Hornik <kurt.hor...@wu.ac.at> wrote: > > > My guess would be that the new syntax is particularly prominently used > > in examples: if so, it would be good to also have coverage for this. > > In today's CRAN snapshot, there turned out to be 198 packages that use > 4.1 syntax in examples but not in code, 5 packages that use 4.2 syntax > in examples but 4.1 in the code, and 3 packages that use 4.2 syntax in > examples but not the code. This may be slightly imprecise because I > don't have some of the Rd macro packages installed and run > Rd2ex(stages=NULL) on manually-parsed Rd files without installing the > packages. > > Attaching a patch that checks the syntax used in Rd examples at the > same time as the main R code, not necessarily the best way to perform > this check. Is it perhaps worth separating R/* checks from man/*.Rd > checks? Should R CMD check try to reuse the Rd database from the > installed copy of the package? > > -- > Best regards, > Ivan > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > -- http://hadley.nz [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
