Moved to Bugzilla as a wishlist item:

    https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18983

Mikael

Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 21:16:11 +0100
From: Kurt Hornik <[email protected]>

>>>>> Ben Bolker writes:

Right, but as Gabor already pointed out, now that we have xtfrm (which
has a numeric_version method) there is no reason why which.max() and
which.min() should not take advantage of it in the case of classed
arguments.
I'll try to discuss this within R Core: patches welcome :-)

Best
-k

>   Sorry if this is obvious, but `which.max()` is hard-coded in C, with a
> step at the beginning that attempts to coerce the vector to numeric

> 
https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/blob/5e0a5f013292e56c73360addb61ddaa7d3ca16a2/src/main/summary.c#L1027

> Another alternative (your methods are probably better?)

> which.max.nv <- function(x) (seq_along(x)[x == max(x)])[1]

>    It seems like too much work to change the definition of package versions
> (which is a list of integer vectors, under the hood) or to make a generic
> S3 method for which.max, given that the workarounds are so easy.

>   Also, the documentation explicitly calls out this limitation:

> x: numeric (logical, integer or double) vector or an R object
>           for which the internal coercion to ‘double’ works whose ‘min’
>           or ‘max’ is searched for.



> On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 10:35 AM Gabor Grothendieck <[email protected]>
> wrote:

>> versions <- c("9.10", "9.2")
>> nv <- numeric_version(versions)
>> class(nv)
>> ## [1] "numeric_version"
>> >> max(nv) # ok
>> ## [1] ‘9.10’
>> >> versions[tail(order(nv), 1)] # ok
>> ## [1] "9.10"
>> >> sort(nv, decreasing = TRUE)[1] # ok
>> ## [1] ‘9.10’
>> >> versions[which.max(xtfrm(nv))] # ok
>> ## [1] "9.10"
>> >> versions[which.max(nv)] # error
>> ## Error in which.max(nv) : 'list' object cannot be coerced to type
>> 'double'
>> >> >> --
>> Statistics & Software Consulting
>> GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
>> tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
>> email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com
>> >> ______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>

>    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

> ______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel





______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

Reply via email to