On 24 Jan 2003 at 20:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's a feature, as a few seconds' exploration would have confirmed. > > > x <- table(c(2,NA,1,1,1,NaN),exclude=NULL) > > names(x) > [1] "1" "2" NA "NaN" > > so R *does* label them, and as (unlike NaNs) it does not know what they > are, it *prints* them as blanks. (I wanted to change that but there was > resistance.)
Why there were resistance? This seems like an obvious betterment! Kjetil Halvorsen ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
