On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Luke Tierney wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, John Chambers wrote: > > > > > I think this is a consequence of the extra context added to make methods > > > work right with R lexical scoping, namespaces, etc. Or a subtlety in > > > R's definition of missing()? > > > > > > > We need a bit more info transferred across from the generic and we > > need to reset the environments of the promises for missing arguments. > > I'll look into it. > > A workaround should be in place in R-devel now. >
Thanks very much! It looks like the problems we had are now resolved in the new R-devel, and SparseM is back in business. Roger url: www.econ.uiuc.edu Roger Koenker Dept. of Economics UCL, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Department of Economics Drayton House, vox: 217-333-4558 University of Illinois 30 Gordon St, fax: 217-244-6678 Champaign, IL 61820 London,WC1H 0AX, UK ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
